Most funding databases hand you a search box and a list. FundAtlas takes one organisation, walks every open call against six eligibility dimensions, and tells you which it can actually win — and which rule stands in the way.
It finds, matches and notifies. It does not fill in forms, and it never lets a model decide a verdict: a language model reads the call, Python decides the answer.
Every call is judged against a specific organisation. The answer is one of four, and each carries a confidence band saying how much evidence sits behind it.
Every dimension clears. Nothing known stands in the way.
Winnable once something is done — a partner recruited, a portal ID obtained.
Nobody has read the call's own rules yet. A gap, stated as a gap.
A rule read off this call blocks it. Only hard evidence may say so.
Of 3,290 rules on file, 128 were read off a call's own text. The rest are inherited from programme patterns and are marked as such — which is why a confidence band travels with every verdict instead of a bare yes or no.
Thirty-six sources, polled nightly — the European Commission's own API, thirteen national Erasmus+ agencies, and the Bulgarian and Cypriot funding portals.
FundAtlas was built against two Burgas organisations and their live funding questions. Every rule in it exists because a real call forced it.
Education and youth projects in Burgas. The applicant vehicle for grant work, and the organisation most of the eligibility engine was designed around.
northstarbulgaria.org ↗Cambridge and Pearson examination centre, British Council Addvantage partner, and winner of fourteen consecutive Cambridge and British Council awards.
britishcentreburgas.com ↗